F Hayek shoe0nhead

Shoe0nHeadalism (including Social Libertarianism) Anti Centrism

PLUS:

"There are difficult questions about the precise standard which should thus be assured... but there can be no doubt that some minimum of food, shelter, and clothing, sufficient to preserve health and the capacity to work, can be assured to everybody."

Friedrich Hayek and his brand of Social Capitalism/ Post Neoliberalism

After we are in this State Socialist (strongly centralized , artisan and similar to Progressive Morally Conservative Populism) society and enough time has passed, in order to avoid ending up like the USSR, Eastern bloc and similar Marxist Leninist countries ended up ,I feel that the whatever remains of or whatever form of the state that is existing at that time, should concentrate power to rep the working class with the political partys decisions integrated into public life that its economic and non economic decisions are part of their overall actions. 

Sort of like a pseudo more direct participatory democracy but one that feels natural and like minarchist (or like society runs the state) . Society would own the means of production with a state adjacent post state entity actually owning it to please Anarchists and statists alike. This would mean the state adjacent post state entity would in a covert ,stealth way work for the benefit of the working class and society. 

This can and really should be done via socially equitable distribution of the national income in which goods and services are provided for free by the state (enforced to directly provided) that supplement private consumption but very VERY ideally if it can be done in a ‘(Frederich Hayek State Communalist’ sort of way (maybe with autonomous civic communes with a mutualist economy and Meritocratic social system) and with small scale worker democracies. Hayakian State Communalism is to a State version of Communalism what Hayakian Socialism is to Socialism.  

Post–World War II (from Wikipedia)

In Europe after World War II, centre-right Christian democratic parties arose as powerful political movements while the Catholic traditionalist movements in Europe diminished in strength.[11] Christian democratic movements became major movements in Austria, the Benelux countries, Germany and Italy.[11]

Neoliberalism arose as an economic theory by Milton Friedman that condemned government interventionism in the economy that it associated with socialism and collectivism.[12] Neoliberals rejected Keynesian economics that they claimed advocate too much emphasis on relieving unemployment in response to their observance of the Great Depression, identifying the real problem as being with inflation and advocate the policy of monetarism to deal with inflation.[13]

Neoliberal economics was endorsed by Conservative British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who adapted it as part of a free-market conservatism closer to the developments in American conservatism, while traditionalist conservatism became less influential within the British Conservative Party.[14] However, the British Conservative Party still has a large traditional conservative base, particularly the conservative Cornerstone Group. Thatcher publicly supported centre-right politics and supported its spread in Eastern Europe after the end of the Marxist-Leninist regimes in the late 1980s and early 1990s.[15] After the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, a variety of centre-right political parties have emerged there, including many that support neoliberalism.[16][17]

In the United States, President Ronald Reagan (1981–1989) adopted many policies stemming from Milton Friedman's economic theories, including principles from the Chicago school of economics and monetarism.[18] While social conservatives and the rise of the Christian Right contributed greatly to forming the Reagan Coalition, the President also had the support of centre-right economic neoliberals. Using Friedman's neoliberal theories, the Reagan administration cut the marginal income tax from 70% to 28%[citation needed] and slowed government spending growth from 10% in 1982 to 1% in 1987, thereby reducing inflation from 13.5% to 4.1% and civilian unemployment from 7.6% to 5.5% of the workforce throughout his tenure.[19]

https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/why-did-hayek-support-basic-income

https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2019/11/hayek-freedom-and-the-universal-basic-income/

https://archive.ph/4Rjjz

This is why both Fred Hayek and Milton Friedman, each extremely well-known advocates of free markets, each liked the idea of basic income. People know what's best for them, not governments, so just give people cash, and let them use it in markets. Basic income also allows for the removal of market distortionary policies like welfare, subsidies, and minimum wage laws.

May 28, 2023 — Even Milton Friedman supported a safety net.(Libertarian Socialist coalition) The Pragmatic Case for Universal Basic Income

Medium

https://james-rooney474.medium.com › ...

Feb 24, 2019 — Even Milton Friedman supported the idea back in the 1970's, arguing it to ... UBI would provide a logical social safety net equipped for the ...

Here's another good read along these lines as well, explaining the Hayekian price system. (from reddit futurology)

Frederich Hayak supported Universal Basic income but only once a certain level of wealth is obtained so that there is no reason for a country not to create such a system

Milton Friedman Hidden Anarchism in Capitalism and Freedom

he Tyranny of Economists

New Republic

https://newrepublic.com › article › tyranny-economists

Milton Friedman Dengist Capitalism

which combine translates into Welfare Chauvinism